The Endangered Feature: Cataloguing Removed Streaming Capabilities for Future Research

Why a catalog of removed streaming features matters now

Researchers, teachers, and lifelong learners routinely hit the same wall: a feature that once shaped how viewers experienced media disappears and its traces evaporate behind corporate silence and closed platforms. The result is scattered press coverage, user complaints, and fragmented forum posts that leave crucial questions unanswered—Who designed this feature? Why was it removed? How did users adapt? These are not just trivia; they are primary evidence for the history of digital media and UX design.

In early 2026 the conversation sharpened when Netflix removed its mobile-to-device casting capability with little notice, creating a focal case for why we need systematic preservation. As Janko Roettgers observed in The Verge,

"Last month, Netflix made the surprising decision to kill off a key feature: With no prior warning, the company removed the ability to cast videos from its mobile apps to a wide range of smart TVs and streaming devices." — Janko Roettgers, The Verge, Jan 16, 2026

This article proposes a practical digital-archival project to catalog removed features from streaming platforms—a structured, sustainable resource for media archives, UX historians, legal scholars, and product teams. It maps what to collect, how to collect, the technical stack to use (2026-ready), governance and legal strategies, and concrete next steps for launching a pilot focused on the Netflix casting removal.

Topline: what the project is and why it’s urgent

Project name (provisional): The Feature Tomb — a feature catalog. Its mission: document, preserve, and provide access to removed software features and related artifacts from streaming platforms so that future research on product evolution, UX decisions, and media practices is possible.

Why urgent in 2026?

• Faster product churn: AI-driven personalization, subscription strategies, and device fragmentation have accelerated feature experiments and rollbacks.
• Opaque platform governance: Platform companies frequently change behavior without public changelogs; regulatory transparency remains uneven even as oversight increases.
• Research infrastructure gaps: Libraries and archives are catching up to preserving software artifacts and ephemeral metadata at scale.

Who benefits

• Media historians looking to trace feature diffusion, standards (e.g., cast protocols), and business rationales.
• UX researchers and designers studying interaction patterns, second-screen controls, and accessibility implications of removed features.
• Policy analysts and legal scholars examining anticompetitive behavior, consumer harm, or regulatory compliance.
• Product managers and engineers seeking case studies of feature deprecation and migration strategies.

Project objectives and scope

Start focused, scale iteratively. Early objectives:

1. Produce a machine-readable feature catalog with standardized metadata for removed streaming features.
2. Archive representative artifacts: release notes, app binaries (where legal), screenshots, changelog entries, support pages, social-media responses, and video demos.
3. Index and crosswalk entries with platform change logs, patent filings, and developer docs.
4. Provide an open API and export formats for scholarly use and classroom adoption.

Minimum viable dataset: what each record should contain

A practical metadata model matters. Below is a compact, research-oriented schema—design it as JSON-LD for interoperability and assign DOIs for preservation-grade records.

• record_id: persistent identifier (e.g., doi: or ark:)
• feature_name: canonical name (e.g., "Mobile-to-TV Casting")
• platform: company and product (e.g., Netflix iOS app)
• feature_category: UX control, playback, social, monetization, accessibility, etc.
• introduced_date: earliest documented rollout
• deprecated_date: date of removal or deprecation notice
• removal_evidence: URLs to changelogs, press coverage, support articles
• artifacts: pointers to archived APKs, screenshots (IIIF manifests), video demos (WARC or MP4), and code samples
• provenance: who collected the artifact and how
• legal_status: copyright, licenses, and access restrictions
• user_impact_notes: summaries of user complaints, accessibility reports, and forum threads
• related_documents: patents, standards (e.g., DIAL, Google Cast), and developer docs
• tags: free-text for UX patterns, devices affected, regional constraints

How to collect: practical methods and tools (2026-ready)

Use a mix of automated capture and human-curated contextualization. Below are pragmatic approaches and recommended tools:

1. Capture official traces

• Archive support pages and release notes with Webrecorder, Browsertrix or Pywb and store in WARC format.
• Harvest official changelogs and developer docs using site crawlers and preserve snapshots in the Internet Archive and institutional repositories.

2. Preserve app artifacts

• Where legally permissible, deposit or index app packages (APK, IPA) in a controlled-access repository. Use checksums and sign metadata. For iOS, preserve binaries and screenshots collected during product reviews or research builds.
• Using automated device farms (e.g., BrowserStack, Firebase Test Lab) capture video walkthroughs and network traces demonstrating the feature. Consider lightweight autonomous capture agents for repeatable tests where appropriate (with legal review).

3. Capture user context and reaction

• Archive social posts (Twitter/X threads, Reddit discussions), bug reports, and user support threads with time-stamped context.
• Collect qualitative interviews, accessibility reports, and user-created demos that show how people used the feature. Cross-reference these with migration guidance such as the Migration Guide model for tracing platform transitions.

4. Technical logs and telemetry (ethical)

• Where possible and with consent, collect anonymized telemetry or instrumentation snapshots that demonstrate feature behavior (e.g., which devices supported casting). Store telemetry on compliant infrastructure and follow institutional review processes.

Legal and ethical considerations

No archival plan is complete without a legal/ethical framework. Key points:

• Copyright and DMCA: Preserving and providing access to binaries can implicate copyright. Partner with legal counsel and deposit artifacts in controlled-access "trusted research environments" where use is limited to non-replicative scholarship.
• Terms of Service: Respect platform ToS; scraping and automated collection should follow robots.txt and legal guidance. When in doubt, negotiate data-sharing agreements.
• Privacy: Remove or anonymize PII from user posts and datasets. For telemetry, follow IRB-equivalent review for human-subjects research.
• Fair use & research exceptions: Build a policy that documents reliance on fair use and local exceptions, and seek institutional backing from university libraries or national archives.

Governance, sustainability, and partnerships

A sustainable catalog needs institutional partners and community governance.

• Host metadata and public artifacts on a university or national library repository with long-term preservation policies (LOCKSS/Trusted Digital Repositories).
• Partner with established digital preservation organizations—Internet Archive, Webrecorder, and academic consortia—to manage storage and WARC holdings.
• Create a community steering group including librarians, UX scholars, product historians, and legal experts to curate standards and accession policies.
• Pursue mixed funding: grants (NEH, ERC, Knight Foundation), institutional subscriptions for advanced features, and community donations.

Technical architecture: blueprint for the first year

Design for openness, machine-readability, and controlled access for restricted artifacts. Proposed stack:

• Metadata: JSON-LD schema validated against a JSON Schema; minted DOIs/ARKs for authoritative records.
• Archive storage: WARC for web captures; IIIF manifests for images/screenshots; S3/Preservica for binary storage and cold-line backups.
• Search & API: Elasticsearch/OpenSearch for faceted discovery; public RESTful API plus an OAI-PMH endpoint for harvesters.
• Provenance & versioning: Git for metadata and documentation; content-addressed storage and checksums for artifacts.
• Access controls: Shibboleth/OAuth for researcher access; tiered access for sensitive binaries.

Pilot plan: cataloguing the Netflix casting removal

A targeted pilot demonstrates feasibility and attracts stakeholders. Steps and deliverables for a 6-month pilot:

1. Month 0–1: Scoping and partnerships — secure a host institution (university library), legal counsel, and a technical lead; publicly announce the pilot to attract collaborators.
2. Month 1–3: Rapid ingestion — crawl Netflix support pages, developer docs, help forums; archive press coverage and social media responses (e.g., The Verge article and community threads).
3. Month 2–4: Artifact collection — collect screenshots, device traces, and demo videos showing casting behavior across device types and OS versions; ingest any app packages that can be legally preserved under controlled access.
4. Month 3–5: Metadata modeling and record creation — create canonical records for the casting feature with cross-references to standards (Google Cast, DIAL), patents, and bug reports.
5. Month 5–6: Publish and evaluate — launch a public catalog entry with an API, soliciting feedback from UX scholars and teachers; publish a methods note describing legal/ethical decisions for replication.

Use cases and research outputs

Expected outputs and how they'll be used:

• Comparative studies of feature lifecycles across platforms (e.g., Netflix vs. Prime Video) and their UX consequences.
• Classroom modules for HCI and digital media courses built from primary artifacts and archived demos.
• Legal briefs and policy reports that reference archived evidence of platform behavior and user impact.
• Design pattern taxonomies and deprecation playbooks for product teams.

Risks and mitigation

Anticipate common risks and pragmatic responses:

• Platform pushback: Negotiate DMCA-safe deposit agreements or rely on controlled-access, research-only holdings.
• Resource limits: Prioritize lightweight metadata and web captures first; scale to binaries with partner funding.
• Data quality: Maintain provenance fields and confidence scores for contested claims.

Metrics of success (first 12 months)

• Number of documented feature records (target 50+ removed features across 10 platforms)
• Number of artifact captures (WARC, APKs, screenshots; target 500 items)
• API calls and downloads by researchers and educators
• Academic and classroom use: citations, syllabi adoptions, and published studies using the catalog

Case study sketch: what a single record looks like

Record: Netflix — Mobile-to-TV Casting (deprecated Jan 2026)

• Introduced: 2011–2013 (gradual rollouts)
• Deprecated: Jan 2026 (no public deprecation notice; observed removal via app behavior)
• Evidence: archived Netflix help center snapshot (link), Verge coverage (link), support forum threads (link), device test captures (IIIF manifest for screenshots)
• Artifacts: WARC of help pages, demo MP4s from device farm showing prior casting behavior, APK versions exhibiting the feature (legal status: controlled access)
• User impact: aggregated complaint threads underscoring accessibility and second-screen use cases

Advanced strategies and future directions (2026–2028)

Beyond archiving removed features, the project can evolve to support:

• Feature provenance networks: map how patterns diffused across platforms using citation graphs and patent linkages.
• Automated changelog ingestion: partner with platforms to receive structured change notifications (webhooks) to capture deprecations in real time. See models like the community patch-note tracker for inspiration.
• Interoperability standards: contribute a schema for feature metadata to schema.org and library standards bodies.
• Teaching toolkits: prebuilt assignments, slide decks, and datasets for UX and digital media courses.

Actionable next steps for readers

Here are concrete ways you can contribute or replicate this work in your context:

1. Document one removal: Choose a removed feature you care about (e.g., Netflix casting), collect two to five artifacts (press article, help page snapshot, screenshot), and create a minimal metadata record using the schema above.
2. Join a pilot: Contact a local university library to propose a small-scale collaboration; libraries can provide governance and preservation expertise.
3. Share evidence: Tweet or post links to archived artifacts with the hashtag #FeatureTomb to help crowdsource leads and provenance.
4. Teach from artifacts: Build a 1–2 week classroom module that asks students to analyze a removed feature’s UX, technical underpinnings, and user reception.

Final note: why this matters beyond nostalgia

Software features are cultural objects. When a playback control or a social sharing button is removed, we lose not just functionality but a record of user expectation, business strategy, and technological constraint. A dedicated catalog of removed streaming features turns the ephemeral into evidence. It supports accountability, fuels scholarship, and equips designers and policy makers with the historical record they lack today.

Call to action

If you are a librarian, researcher, archivist, or builder who cares about media history and UX, we invite you to help launch the pilot. Contribute artifacts, host a seed dataset, or collaborate on governance. Email feature-tomb@historical.website to join the working group, or submit a candidate removal record at historical.website/feature-tomb/submit. Together we can turn fragmented traces into a lasting research infrastructure for the digital age.

Related Reading

• Build a community patch-note tracker (patch-note ingestion inspiration)
• Product catalog & Elasticsearch case study (search & discovery design)
• Resilient cloud-native architectures (hosting archival systems)
• AI Casting & Living History (context on 'casting' as a design/ethics topic)
• When a Franchise Shifts: How Leadership Changes (Like a New Star Wars Slate) Affect Domain Values
• Content Safety Playbook: What to Do If an AI Deepfake Targets You or Your Community
• Traveling with Pets to the Coast in 2026 — Carriers, Rules, and Comfort Tips
• How to vet new social platforms for safe esports communities (Bluesky, Digg and beyond)
• Scaling Production: Procurement and Financing Lessons from a Craft Syrup Maker